<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initiative 1033: This boat won&#8217;t float.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2009/09/01/initiative-1033-this-boat-wont-float/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2009/09/01/initiative-1033-this-boat-wont-float/</link>
	<description>News and perspective on public policy issues affecting Washington&#039;s economy and quality of life, brought to you by the Economic Opportunity Institute.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Keating</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2009/09/01/initiative-1033-this-boat-wont-float/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=2598#comment-2171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To borrow a line from a well-known dairy marketing campaign: Got proof? 

Fact: These Coloradans definitely think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1B9Xs2QTmo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TABOR was a bad idea&lt;/a&gt; for their state. 

Fact: I-1033 &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010063740_apwarevenuecapinitiative.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;caps revenue&lt;/a&gt; at today&#039;s recession-era levels. So by definition it limits spending to those same low levels. 

Fact: Current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofm.wa.gov/initiatives/i-1033_fiscal_impact.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;projections estimate&lt;/a&gt; nearly $6 billion in lost state revenue, and another $2.8 billion loss for cities and counties.

Fact: I-1033 replaces decision-making by our representative government with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2010034792_edit11initiative1033.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one-size fits none&lt;/a&gt; population plus inflation formula. 

Fact: I-1033 rebates are &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2010058262_danny14.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;based on the value of the property&lt;/a&gt;, so high-value property owners (i.e., commercial real estate, multimillion dollar properties) will receive the biggest rebate checks. Renters will receive nothing. Low- and middle-value property owners will see something...low to middling.

Fact: &lt;a href=&quot;http://no1033.com/index.php?page=display&amp;id=87&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opposition&lt;/a&gt; to I-1033 comes from educators, firefighters, business owners, nurses, elected leaders, and many, many others. Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33346559/ns/local_news-spokane_wa/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bill Gates&lt;/a&gt;.

The bottom line: I-1033 will limit our collective ability to invest in economic growth and business development, improvements to K-12 education, health care for seniors, affordable colleges and technical schools, new transportation networks...the list goes on...to recession-level spending levels. 

It&#039;s just not sound public policy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To borrow a line from a well-known dairy marketing campaign: Got proof? </p>
<p>Fact: These Coloradans definitely think <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1B9Xs2QTmo" rel="nofollow">TABOR was a bad idea</a> for their state. </p>
<p>Fact: I-1033 <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010063740_apwarevenuecapinitiative.html" rel="nofollow">caps revenue</a> at today&#8217;s recession-era levels. So by definition it limits spending to those same low levels. </p>
<p>Fact: Current <a href="http://www.ofm.wa.gov/initiatives/i-1033_fiscal_impact.pdf" rel="nofollow">projections estimate</a> nearly $6 billion in lost state revenue, and another $2.8 billion loss for cities and counties.</p>
<p>Fact: I-1033 replaces decision-making by our representative government with a <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2010034792_edit11initiative1033.html" rel="nofollow">one-size fits none</a> population plus inflation formula. </p>
<p>Fact: I-1033 rebates are <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2010058262_danny14.html" rel="nofollow">based on the value of the property</a>, so high-value property owners (i.e., commercial real estate, multimillion dollar properties) will receive the biggest rebate checks. Renters will receive nothing. Low- and middle-value property owners will see something&#8230;low to middling.</p>
<p>Fact: <a href="http://no1033.com/index.php?page=display&amp;id=87" rel="nofollow">Opposition</a> to I-1033 comes from educators, firefighters, business owners, nurses, elected leaders, and many, many others. Like <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33346559/ns/local_news-spokane_wa/" rel="nofollow">Bill Gates</a>.</p>
<p>The bottom line: I-1033 will limit our collective ability to invest in economic growth and business development, improvements to K-12 education, health care for seniors, affordable colleges and technical schools, new transportation networks&#8230;the list goes on&#8230;to recession-level spending levels. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just not sound public policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tandy</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2009/09/01/initiative-1033-this-boat-wont-float/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=2598#comment-2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scare tactics won&#039;t work anymore.  Neither will twisting, lies and deception.  Washington State has misled the people many, many times.

The TABOR initiative in Colorado was absolutely not a disaster - check with people in Colorado.  They did suspend it for a period of time but refused to get rid of it.  In fact, it goes right back into effect this next year which totally squashes the argument comparing TABOR to I-1033.

Likewise, 1033 does not freeze state spending or county spending or city spending.  Anti-1033 forces are badly distorting the truth.

Look up the contributors and supporters.  Anti-1033 folks are unions and only a tiny handful of individuals.  Pro-1033 folks are thousands of inidividuals.  Don&#039;t let unions run the state and muscle the legislature to take more tax money away from everyone else for their own selfish benefit.

AND GUESS WHAT ELSE THEY&#039;RE NOT TELLING YOU - as soon as this election is over the legislature and Gregoire want to eliminate the 60% requirement to increase taxes because the 2-year &quot;hands off&quot; period is about to expire.  Plus Gregoire has already declared support for INCREASING property taxes.  Governor Gargoyle and the legislature are ready to do what the unions tell them - don&#039;t give them the chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scare tactics won&#8217;t work anymore.  Neither will twisting, lies and deception.  Washington State has misled the people many, many times.</p>
<p>The TABOR initiative in Colorado was absolutely not a disaster &#8211; check with people in Colorado.  They did suspend it for a period of time but refused to get rid of it.  In fact, it goes right back into effect this next year which totally squashes the argument comparing TABOR to I-1033.</p>
<p>Likewise, 1033 does not freeze state spending or county spending or city spending.  Anti-1033 forces are badly distorting the truth.</p>
<p>Look up the contributors and supporters.  Anti-1033 folks are unions and only a tiny handful of individuals.  Pro-1033 folks are thousands of inidividuals.  Don&#8217;t let unions run the state and muscle the legislature to take more tax money away from everyone else for their own selfish benefit.</p>
<p>AND GUESS WHAT ELSE THEY&#8217;RE NOT TELLING YOU &#8211; as soon as this election is over the legislature and Gregoire want to eliminate the 60% requirement to increase taxes because the 2-year &#8220;hands off&#8221; period is about to expire.  Plus Gregoire has already declared support for INCREASING property taxes.  Governor Gargoyle and the legislature are ready to do what the unions tell them &#8211; don&#8217;t give them the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Zemke</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2009/09/01/initiative-1033-this-boat-wont-float/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Zemke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 08:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=2598#comment-2091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Initiative 1033 is a a no growth measure.  It attempts to freeze public spending.

The Washington State Office of Financial Management says that Initiative 1033 would severely impact state and local government.

In their words &quot;The initiative reduces state general fund revenues that support education, social, health and environmental services; and general government activities by an estimated $5.9 billion by 2015. The initiative also reduces general fund revenues that support public safety, infrastructure and general government activities by an estimated $694 million for counties and $2.1 billion for cities by 2015&quot;

This is the impact Tim doesn&#039;t want you to see. Read it yourself.

see http://ofm.wa.gov/initiatives/i-1033_fiscal_impact.pdf

Vote NO on I-1033!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initiative 1033 is a a no growth measure.  It attempts to freeze public spending.</p>
<p>The Washington State Office of Financial Management says that Initiative 1033 would severely impact state and local government.</p>
<p>In their words &#8220;The initiative reduces state general fund revenues that support education, social, health and environmental services; and general government activities by an estimated $5.9 billion by 2015. The initiative also reduces general fund revenues that support public safety, infrastructure and general government activities by an estimated $694 million for counties and $2.1 billion for cities by 2015&#8243;</p>
<p>This is the impact Tim doesn&#8217;t want you to see. Read it yourself.</p>
<p>see <a href="http://ofm.wa.gov/initiatives/i-1033_fiscal_impact.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ofm.wa.gov/initiatives/i-1033_fiscal_impact.pdf</a></p>
<p>Vote NO on I-1033!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

