<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initiative 1098: Will business owners pay state income tax?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/</link>
	<description>News and perspective on public policy issues affecting Washington&#039;s economy and quality of life, brought to you by the Economic Opportunity Institute.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Keating</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/#comment-4120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=4922#comment-4120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim, I don&#039;t think you have reason to worry. The will of the people is very clear in I-1098: The legislature needs to go back to voters if they want to adjust either tax rates or income thresholds. Three things would have to happen for the legislature to expand the income tax to the middle class:

1) Two years after I-1098 passes, the state legislature (a majority of them anyway) decide they want to be voted out of office, so they vote to amend it.

2) After the legislature commits what amounts to political suicide, no one chooses to challenge whatever law the legislature passed via initiative/referendum.

3) After it is challenged, it goes to the ballot and the voters of Washington approve expanding the income tax.

None of those three scenarios seems likely to me, and even less so all three of them occurring. 

As for the property tax percentage you mention, I-1098 does in fact cut the state portion of the property tax by 20 percent. On average, about 80% of property taxes paid go to local counties and are for schools and investments in other public structures. So the effective property tax reduction for an individual or business would likely be around 4%, depending on their local situation.

You can calculate and itemize your personal and business tax changes under I-1098 using EOI&#039;s online I-1098 Calculator, available here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/calculator.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/calculator.htm&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I don&#8217;t think you have reason to worry. The will of the people is very clear in I-1098: The legislature needs to go back to voters if they want to adjust either tax rates or income thresholds. Three things would have to happen for the legislature to expand the income tax to the middle class:</p>
<p>1) Two years after I-1098 passes, the state legislature (a majority of them anyway) decide they want to be voted out of office, so they vote to amend it.</p>
<p>2) After the legislature commits what amounts to political suicide, no one chooses to challenge whatever law the legislature passed via initiative/referendum.</p>
<p>3) After it is challenged, it goes to the ballot and the voters of Washington approve expanding the income tax.</p>
<p>None of those three scenarios seems likely to me, and even less so all three of them occurring. </p>
<p>As for the property tax percentage you mention, I-1098 does in fact cut the state portion of the property tax by 20 percent. On average, about 80% of property taxes paid go to local counties and are for schools and investments in other public structures. So the effective property tax reduction for an individual or business would likely be around 4%, depending on their local situation.</p>
<p>You can calculate and itemize your personal and business tax changes under I-1098 using EOI&#8217;s online I-1098 Calculator, available here: <a href="http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/calculator.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/calculator.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Eaton</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Eaton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=4922#comment-4118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not worried that the rich people of WA will be taxed.

I am worried that all the tax paying Washington state citizens will be paying an INCOME TAX in a few years.

Also several Seattle news stations tell us it is not 20 percent it is FOUR!

[snipped by moderator per &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/comment-policy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment policy&lt;/a&gt;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not worried that the rich people of WA will be taxed.</p>
<p>I am worried that all the tax paying Washington state citizens will be paying an INCOME TAX in a few years.</p>
<p>Also several Seattle news stations tell us it is not 20 percent it is FOUR!</p>
<p>[snipped by moderator per <a href="http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/comment-policy/" rel="nofollow">comment policy</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Keating</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=4922#comment-2869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right that we didn&#039;t include S-Corp/Partnership income in our initial analysis, and I&#039;ve updated our fact sheet accordingly. (See first link below.) 

But your own analysis above is incomplete, in that you address only business income for taxpayers with an AGI above $200,000. A more comprehensive approach would include all tax filers claiming net business income.

Our updated fact sheet reflects that broader perspective, noting that of all WA tax returns claiming net business income (from a sole proprietorship, S-corporation and/or partnership), only 10.6% show an AGI of more than $200,000. And since 85% of high-income returns are filed jointly, under I-1098 a substantial proportion of those tax filers would be exempt from paying state income tax on AGI up to $400,000 per year.

Most business owners will also see a tax cut under I-1098. According to analysis by the Department of Revenue, I-1098 would exempt 81% of Washington businesses from B&amp;O tax payments, and reduce B&amp;O tax payments for another 12%. Every business that owns property would also see a 20% cut in the state portion of their property taxes. (See second link below.)

Links:
http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/22/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax-updated/
http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/fact_sheets/PropertyTaxReductions-Jun2010.pdf

~Aaron Keating
Communications Director
Economic Opportunity Institute]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that we didn&#8217;t include S-Corp/Partnership income in our initial analysis, and I&#8217;ve updated our fact sheet accordingly. (See first link below.) </p>
<p>But your own analysis above is incomplete, in that you address only business income for taxpayers with an AGI above $200,000. A more comprehensive approach would include all tax filers claiming net business income.</p>
<p>Our updated fact sheet reflects that broader perspective, noting that of all WA tax returns claiming net business income (from a sole proprietorship, S-corporation and/or partnership), only 10.6% show an AGI of more than $200,000. And since 85% of high-income returns are filed jointly, under I-1098 a substantial proportion of those tax filers would be exempt from paying state income tax on AGI up to $400,000 per year.</p>
<p>Most business owners will also see a tax cut under I-1098. According to analysis by the Department of Revenue, I-1098 would exempt 81% of Washington businesses from B&amp;O tax payments, and reduce B&amp;O tax payments for another 12%. Every business that owns property would also see a 20% cut in the state portion of their property taxes. (See second link below.)</p>
<p>Links:<br />
<a href="http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/22/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax-updated/" rel="nofollow">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/22/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax-updated/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/fact_sheets/PropertyTaxReductions-Jun2010.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.eoionline.org/tax_reform/fact_sheets/PropertyTaxReductions-Jun2010.pdf</a></p>
<p>~Aaron Keating<br />
Communications Director<br />
Economic Opportunity Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Davis</title>
		<link>http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2010/06/18/initiative-1098-will-business-owners-pay-state-income-tax/#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/?p=4922#comment-2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You miss partnerships, Sub S, and LLCs in your analysis. http://www.washaceblog.com/2010/06/understanding-how-i1098-will-hurt-the-economy-and-the-state-budget.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss partnerships, Sub S, and LLCs in your analysis. <a href="http://www.washaceblog.com/2010/06/understanding-how-i1098-will-hurt-the-economy-and-the-state-budget.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washaceblog.com/2010/06/understanding-how-i1098-will-hurt-the-economy-and-the-state-budget.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

