Washington Policy Watch

News and perspective on public policy issues affecting Washington's economy and quality of life, brought to you by the Economic Opportunity Institute.

Players and refs say minimum wage is a winner – but a few rich owners want a replay

By many accounts, the 2012 Super Bowl was a close game – but there’s still another big (political) football kicking around: the minimum wage. The players workers actually on the field job say it’s a clear winner – and so do the referees researchers who are closely watching the effect of this important rule. But a few rich owners are calling for a replay.

The Politics

On Wednesday, presidential hopeful Mitt Romney confirmed to the Associated Press his support for raising increasing the federal minimum wage automatically each year to keep up with the rising cost of living. (It’s currently fixed at $7.25 an hour, or about $15,000 a year for a full-time worker.) Newt Gingrich, now the GOP’s 2nd leading aspirant for the nation’s highest office, blasted that position on Meet the Press the following Sunday.

Romney’s position looks moderate – until you look at the stats. Tying today’s minimum wage to inflation would effectively pin a family of three under the poverty level. It’s just too little, too late. Regardless, the eventual Republican nominee will face a tough go on the issue against President Obama, who in 2008 endorsed raising the minimum wage to $9.50 in 2011 and then indexing it to inflation. (There’s still room for an even better rule: if the federal minimum had been indexed to the Consumer Price Index in 1968, it would be more than $10.30 today.)

Locally, Washington’s best-in-the-nation minimum wage was a big issue in the 2008 race for governor. In 2010, backed by a legal opinion issued by state AG Rob McKenna, it was the subject of an unsuccessful lawsuit by business groups seeking to block a 12-cent minimum-wage increase. But so far in 2012, neither McKenna nor Rep. Jay Inslee have had much to say on the issue – save for Inslee tweeting his approval of opposition to three Republican bills in the Washington legislature that proposed weakening the state’s minimum wage.

The Policy

The political debate centers on whether the minimum wage is good for jobs – which is an odd question for two reasons: 1) you’d be hard pressed to find any worker earning minimum wage now who thinks a pay cut will make their job better, and 2) in study after study, there’s no debate at all: higher minimum wages boost incomes without reducing employment or slowing job creation.

That’s true even for teens, who make up less than a quarter of low-wage workers directly affected by the minimum wage – but are often the poster children for proponents of a minimum wage cut. Today’s high teen unemployment is driven by the aftermath of the Great Recession and macroeconomic trends shaping the labor market, not by the minimum wage.

This and other research published over the past twenty years has largely discredited the studies generally relied on by those who support minimum wage cuts. Those studies failed to control for basic differences in population and job growth trends across regions of the country, like population migration from the Rust Belt to the Sun Belt. Control for that – by focusing on neighboring counties, which by their nature have similar economies) with different minimum wage rates – and any correlation between higher minimum wages and slower job growth vanishes.

Is Momentum Shifting?

It’s possible we’re watching a minimum wage increase move into the playoffs, if not the big game (a substantial federal increase plus indexing to inflation) quite yet.

Last Monday New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver introduced a bill raise the state minimum wage to from $7.25 to $8.50 and then index it to inflation. Tuesday, Connecticut House Speaker Chris Donovan introduced a bill to raise the Connecticut minimum wage from $8.25 to $9.75 and then index it to inflation.  New Jersey Speaker Sheila Oliver is pushing legislation to raise the minimum wage to $8.50 and index it to inflation. Last week the Delaware Senate passed legislation to raise their state minimum wage from $7.25 to $8.25.

Similar proposals are already pending in Illinois, Massachusetts, Hawaii and California. Community members in Missouri and San Jose, California are gathering signatures to put measures to increase the minimum wage on the ballot in November. Eighteen states and the District of Columbia have raised their minimum wages higher than the federal level of $7.25 per hour.  Ten states have enacted measures to annually adjust their minimum wage to keep pace with the rising cost of living.

Filed under: minimum wage, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

On the ground: What life is like at minimum wage in Washington

When you earn minimum wage, this is a serious pay cut.

Despite sound economic research showing that good base wages have positive effects on businesses, workers and the economy, attacks on Washington’s minimum wage surface year after year – 2012 was no exception.

On January 31, the House Labor and Workforce Development Committee heard testimony on several bills that would cut the paychecks of Washington’s lowest-wage workers. Representative Condotta, who introduced the bills, noted that he doesn’t have empirical evidence to support them but rather, “on the ground” experience: “We can talk about theories and we can listen to all the think tanks talk about what they have to say – I’m on the ground.”

It’s not a big surprise to see minimum wage detractors fail to acknowledge research that undermines their arguments. But it is frustrating to see them ignore the real “on the ground” struggles of people trying to get by on the minimum wage – like the people who came forward to share their stories at Tuesday’s hearing: Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: minimum wage, , , , , , , ,

Restaurant owners taking the ‘high road’ report better loyalty, creativity and productivity

Taking the High Road: A How-to Guide for Successful Restaurant Employers

A new report from Cornell University and Restaurant Opportunities Center United highlights examples of restaurateurs across the country who have created “win-win-win” solutions for workers, diners, and employers by using “high-road” employment practices.

Nationally, restaurant workers typically earn very low wages; 90% do not receive paid sick days, paid vacation, or health insurance through their employer either. The Cornell/ROC report highlights just how much those policies cost employers: between $4,000 and $14,000 per employee turnover. Costs include recruitment and screening, training, uniforms, admin, and unemployment insurance — as well as negative impacts on team morale, trust building, and relationships with regular customers.

The alternative is “high road employment”, which employers in this report define as practices that support workers and unleash their loyalty, creativity, and productivity to make the restaurant successful. Those practices include livable wages, a healthy workplace through paid sick days, vacation, or health insurance; and career ladders for employees through training and internal promotions policies.

Several prominent local restaurant owners were part of the campaign for a paid sick days ordinance in Seattle, citing the positive effects paid sick days have on the bottom line by improving morale, reducing turnover and reducing the spread of illness. The high-road employers interviewed for this study also reported that the benefits of increased productivity and reduced cost of employee turnover outweigh short-term costs of improving workplace practices. Summary | Full report

Filed under: minimum wage, paid family leave, paid sick days, , ,

Bills to cut Washington’s minimum wage get hearing in Olympia

Rep. Cary Condotta

In yesterday’s “Labor and Workforce Development Committee“ Washington’s best-in-the-nation minimum wage was under attack yet again.

The latest offensive came in the form of three bills, introduced by Rep. Cary Condotta, which would:

  1. reduce the minimum wage for tipped workers,
  2. lower automatic cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) that track inflation, and
  3. suspend the minimum wage COLA when unemployment is above 7.5%.

Rep. Condotta, for his part, argues in favor of the bills because “the cost of labor is driving [restaurants] out of business.” His evidence to back up this statement, as he points out, is not empirical, but rather “on the ground” experience: “We can talk about theories and we can listen to all the think tanks talk about what they have to say – I’m on the ground,” said Rep. Condotta at the hearings.

Perhaps Rep. Condotta doesn’t rely on the empirical evidence because it doesn’t support his theory. Recent research proves there is no significant impact on employment numbers resulting from minimum wage increases.

In addition, Rep. Condotta’s statement that the cost of labor is driving restaurants out of business is inaccurate. The cost of labor – the minimum wage – is stable and rises with inflation. But commodity costs such as dairy, coffee and food have far outpaced inflation, and Rep. Condotta himself points out “restaurants are facing a 9% increase in food costs.” Certainly increased costs are cutting into employers bottom lines, but they’re cutting into everyone else’s too!

See, it’s not just business owners who are paying higher costs for bread, milk and butter – so is everyone else. Rising commodity prices – which are borne by everyone – should not be used as a surrogate for cutting the minimum wage, especially when costs for food, health care and gas are rising. That’s poor economic theory, and a recipe for more economic insecurity for working people.

Those who argue for a reduction in the minimum wage would do well to remember that employees are customers, too. Nearly every dollar of the minimum wage is pumped back into the economy because few workers can afford to save – creating a multiplier effect that ripples throughout the local economy. When the minimum wage is cut, economic activity also decreases.

People earning minimum wage don’t have wiggle room in their finances - their proverbial “belts” have already been tightened. Cutting the wages of the people struggling to get by will only hurt our economy, and likely lead to more working people utilizing government assistance to make ends meet.

Filed under: minimum wage, , , , , , ,

donate

Twitter Updates

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 426 other followers