• Women who take paid leave are more likely to be working one year after a child’s birth than those who do not take leave. This means that employers who invest in their workers ultimately benefit from reduced turnover. Recruiting and hiring new employees is far more costly than keeping the ones you already have.

• Both women and men who take paid leave are significantly less likely to utilize public assistance programs than those who do not take leave. Food stamps and other public assistance programs are necessary to protect the most economically vulnerable. But it makes sense to invest in programs that prevent poverty, too. Putting systems in place to best support our workforce ultimately reduces the extraordinary fiscal and social costs of poverty – something that benefits all members of our communities.

As more women have entered the workforce and the population has aged, increased numbers of workers have found themselves in situations that require an extended absence from work – whether to care for a new baby, an aging parent or a sick spouse.

The 1993 federal Family Medical Leave Act, ensured up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for workers to bond with a new child or care for sick family member. This legislation set an important workplace standard, but its reach is limited — extending only to companies with more than 50 employees and putting restrictions on which workers are able to access the benefit. And, of course, the leave is unpaid. While time to bond with a child or care for a family member is critical, the loss of income over an extended period of time is often impossible for families to manage.

To address the inadequacies of the federal policy, several states have crafted more extensive and inclusive policies to better meet the needs of working families. Currently, two states – California and New Jersey – have policies in place that offer family leave insurance as a component of their temporary disability insurance programs. Both offer up to six weeks of paid leave.

Washington, too, established a Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program in 2007 to provide workers with up to 5 weeks of paid leave. However, the program has not been funded, and implementation has been pushed to 2015. In the meantime, advocates from the Washington Family Leave Coalition have been working to improve the legislation (including an increase to 6 weeks of paid leave) and update the funding mechanism.

Until Washington and other states can establish good policies to address the needs of working families, many will continue to struggle for economic security. Paid family leave is an important workplace benefit that ultimately extends far beyond workers – promoting healthy business, families and communities.

Taking the High Road: A How-to Guide for Successful Restaurant Employers

A new report from Cornell University and Restaurant Opportunities Center United highlights examples of restaurateurs across the country who have created “win-win-win” solutions for workers, diners, and employers by using “high-road” employment practices.

Nationally, restaurant workers typically earn very low wages; 90% do not receive paid sick days, paid vacation, or health insurance through their employer either. The Cornell/ROC report highlights just how much those policies cost employers: between $4,000 and $14,000 per employee turnover. Costs include recruitment and screening, training, uniforms, admin, and unemployment insurance — as well as negative impacts on team morale, trust building, and relationships with regular customers.

The alternative is “high road employment”, which employers in this report define as practices that support workers and unleash their loyalty, creativity, and productivity to make the restaurant successful. Those practices include livable wages, a healthy workplace through paid sick days, vacation, or health insurance; and career ladders for employees through training and internal promotions policies.

Several prominent local restaurant owners were part of the campaign for a paid sick days ordinance in Seattle, citing the positive effects paid sick days have on the bottom line by improving morale, reducing turnover and reducing the spread of illness. The high-road employers interviewed for this study also reported that the benefits of increased productivity and reduced cost of employee turnover outweigh short-term costs of improving workplace practices. Summary | Full report

Jamie Vaughn, owner of Revival Lighting in Spokane

Business experience, academic research and political muscle are backing calls by small business owners for “high road” business and economic development policies – and policymakers are listening.

The recent campaign for paid sick days in Seattle featured local business leaders like Dave Meinert, Makini Howell and Jody Hall. And they didn’t just support the idea – they helped craft the proposal that eventually became law. As Howell put it in an open letter to business owners:

“Not only can paid sick days work for my business, I believe it is exactly the type of public policy that makes our community stronger. Ultimately, strong businesses need strong communities to thrive.”

Before you write that off as the “Seattle liberal establishment” at work, take a look at this article from the Spokane Inlander about Revival Lighting owner Janine Vaughn, who:

showed up as a simple small business owner in Inlander stories about income-tax Initiative 1098 (arguing it would save her small business money) and workers-comp insurance-privatization Initiative 1082 (arguing it would cost her small business money).

Vaughn is a member of the small business lobbying group Main Street Alliance, which initially formed to support the small-business friendly aspects of proposed national health care reform legislation.

The Main Street Alliance, Vaughn explains, is made up of mostly smaller businesses. That’s why they tend to stand in such stark contrast to traditional business lobbying groups – and the Republican agenda.

That kind of contrast gets noticed. The White House has been in touch to get the Alliance’s views on public policy issues that affect small businesses and their employees:

“It’s actually very surprising,” Vaughn says about her sudden ubiquity in the press. “They’re actually listening to the small business voice. It’s exciting.”

Academic research backs up these business owners’ experience with “high road” economic development policies like a strong minimum wage, paid sick days, and paid family leave.

• The latest research by economists comparing counties that share borders across state lines has found that increasing the minimum wage not only increases the incomes of low wage workers, it does so without decreasing the number of jobs. And it benefits employers by decreasing costly turnover.

• Since New Jersey’s paid family leave policy was implemented in 2009, and researchers at Rutgers have found paid leave is not only good for families, it’s better for businesses and leads to reduced use of public assistance.

• A study in the American Journal of Public Health demonstrates how a lack of workplace policies such as paid sick leave contributes significantly to illness among Hispanics — and thus the general population.

This is a welcome and exciting trend – one that bodes well for Washington’s (and America’s) businesses, families and communities as we strive to restore the promise of the middle class and build an economy that works for everyone in the years to come.

For example, when parents can’t take a paid sick day, children are less likely to go to the doctor and more likely to go to school sick. But a 2003-2004 study indicated that only 36% of American children in families below 200% of the federal poverty line had a parent with sick leave, compared with 81% of those above 200% of the poverty line.

At the other end of the age spectrum, this 2008 study shows nearly 1 in 5 American workers provided unpaid care to an elderly person that year, and more than 4 in 10 provided care in the previous five years. But low-income families living from paycheck-to-paycheck are the least likely to have paid sick days available on the job. In the U.S., just 2 in 10 of the lowest paid workers had access to paid sick leave in 2010, compared to 84% of the highest earners.

Given their importance to so many people, it’s no surprise to see so many people “raise their hands” for a minimum paid sick days standard. A 2008 poll from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago found:

• 94 percent of self-identified liberals and 81 percent of self-identified conservatives believed that paid sick day should be a basic workplace right.
• 86 percent of people surveyed said they favor a basic paid sick day policy.
• 77 percent of respondents believed that paid sick days were very important.
• 63 percent of workers who did not have access to paid sick leave said they were concerned about not having paid sick days.
• 46 percent of respondents said they are more likely to vote for a candidate who supports paid sick days.

Eli Lanczos testifies at a Seattle City Council hearing in favor of paid sick days

Crossposted from the Washington Family Leave Coalition:

You helped pass paid sick days in Seattle – but the devil is in the details. As the city begins drafting the rules that will actually implement the new ordinance, your input is crucial!

By attending one of these meetings, you can help ensure Seattle’s Paid Sick Days ordinance is a success!:

• Tuesday, January 24, 2-3:30 p.m.
  Seattle City Hall, Bertha Landis Room

• Wednesday, February 1, 7-8:30 p.m.
  Meadowbrook Community Center, Room 22

• Thursday, February 9, 7-8:30 p.m.
  Jefferson Community Center, Hassselburg Hall

State lawmakers are studying paid sick and safe days bills - and they need to hear your stories!

UPDATED – 01/20/2012, 4:33 PM

Crossposted from the Washington Family Leave Coalition:

Washington lawmakers are studying two Paid Sick and Safe Days bills during this legislative session (House Bill 2508 and Senate Bill 6229) – and they need to hear from you!

Please contact your legislators now to tell them why Paid Sick and Safe Days are important for you and your family’s health and economic security.

And if you’re able, come down to Olympia to show your support for the legislation at these committee hearings:

• Tues, Jan 24, 1:30-3:30 pm, Cherburg Senate Hearing Room 4: Labor, Commerce & Consumer Protection Committee

• Wed, Jan 25, 1:30-3:30 pm, Joint Legislative Office Building, House Hearing Rm C: Labor and Workforce Development Committee

You can learn more about the proposed legislation in this handy overview.

As we head into 2012, there are a lot of questions about where the Occupy energy will go from here. I’m confident it will move in powerful directions–fighting unjust foreclosures and evictions, exploring alternative banking, taking on outrageous student debt, countering the corrosive role of corporate money in politics, and allying in new ways with the growing ranks of poor Americans.

But there are also tangible—maybe not sexy or systemic—reforms that make a real difference in people’s lives and speak to OWS principles, and would benefit from its energy and activism. In 2011, two victories on paid sick leave offer something to build on as we work towards an economy that is more just and fair. Connecticut became the first state to guarantee this common sense protection for working people; and Seattle joined San Francisco and Washington, DC as the only cities with paid sick leave on the books.

As of New Year’s Day, hundreds of thousands of workers in Connecticut no longer have to choose between a paycheck, a job and taking care of a sick child or themselves; and on September 1, when the Seattle law takes effect, an estimated 150,000 workers who didn’t have paid sick days will begin to accrue them—thousands more will earn additional paid sick leave and have the flexibility and protection to actually use it. With more than 40 million workers in the US lacking a single paid sick day—and low-wage, women and Latino workers disproportionately affected—these new laws will also offer more evidence that this humane, decent approach to the workplace is also good for business. That’s important as more states and municipalities look to pass similar legislation.

What makes me angry is that paid sick leave is treated as a left versus right issue, when it’ s really about right versus wrong, and common sense. That was something organizers seized on as they pushed the Seattle bill.

“When parents don’t have access to paid sick leave, that means when their kids are sick they can’t stay home with that child,” says Marilyn Watkins, policy director for the Economic Opportunity Institute (EOI) which brought together public health groups, businesses, unions and community organizations to form the Seattle Coalition for a Healthy Workforce. “We had school nurses testifying about sick kids lined up in their offices with no adult able to come pick them up. Or children begging them not to call a parent because they were afraid she would lose her job if she had to come and pick them up.”

But even when the moral argument is clear, one lesson from both the Seattle and Connecticut victories is this: only hard, savvy organizing can overcome the entrenched corporate interests and Big Business lobbies with their rote arguments that reform will “cost jobs” or create a “competitive disadvantage”, “now isn’t the time”, etc. As Connecticut Working Families Party (CT WFP) executive director Jon Green puts it, “There are no shortcuts” when it comes to prevailing in these campaigns.

For the CT WFP that meant four years of work prior to passing the legislation. It meant forming a diverse coalition that included labor, women’s groups, doctors, nurses, antipoverty groups, retirees, and enlightened business owners. There was an aggressive and creative media campaign, and canvassing that knocked on tens of thousands of doors, generating thousands of testimonials, letters, emails, and phone calls. The coalition relied on smart research and advice from the likes of the National Partnership for Women and Families, the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, the Economic Policy Institute, Family Values at Work, and others.

Considering the economic climate and powerful opposition that is intent on turning back the clock on hard-earned protections at the workplace, and that the margin of victory in passing the final bill in the Senate was just one vote—18-17—it’s clear that every ounce of energy from the entire coalition was required.

In Washington State, the path was no less arduous.

EOI’s statewide coalition began pushing work-family issues and paid sick leave in the state legislature over a decade ago. In 2009, on the heels of the H1N1 epidemic and sick leave legislation passing in San Francisco, DC, and Milwaukee (which was never implemented, thank you once again Scott Walker), the focus turned to municipal campaigns and there was a lot of interest in Seattle.

Throughout 2010 organizers focused on building a formidable coalition in the city. Statewide groups reached out to local groups like the Seattle Women’s Commission and Martin Luther King County Labor Council. There was a concerted effort to bring in small businesses, city council members, the mayor’s office, and the Office of Civil Rights—responsible for enforcement. Members of a coalition that had worked hard to pass national healthcare were also engaged in the local fight. Ultimately, more than 75 organizations joined the Seattle Coalition for a Healthy Workforce, including MomsRising, Puget Sound Sage, UFCW 21, Legal Voice, Washington CAN, Puget Sound Alliance for Retired Americans, and the Washington State Labor Council.

By the end of 2010 the Seattle coalition was confident that the pieces were in place for a legislative push. The visible, public part of the campaign occurred between the end of April through passage in September, but the groundwork had been laid for over a year and a half. The people of Seattle turned out—sending emails, making phone calls, packing city hall, attending rallies, and testifying at hearings. It was clear to elected officials that “the vast majority of people who live and work and shop and eat out in Seattle supported this policy,” Watkins says.

“People thought it was a really fast campaign but a number of groups had been working on this for a long time and it gave us a really strong start,” says Watkins. “We built a coalition that had a high level of trust among members. We really were able to build both the grasstops and the grassroots strength to run a successful campaign.”

This month, another fight for economic sanity will occur in New York City over a bill that would require a living wage for workers on large, city-funded development projects. Mayor Michael Bloomberg has already rolled out the job loss/competitive disadvantage arguments. The New York Times cites a Center for American Progress study that found 15 cities with living wage laws—including Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Cleveland and San Francisco—“had the same levels of employment growth” as similar cities without the higher wage requirements. New York City Public Advocate and Nation contributor Bill De Blasio—expected to run for mayor in 2013—has come out full steam in support.

This battle is like those waged successfully in Connecticut and Seattle in 2011—it’s about the heart and soul of this nation, and reforms that make a big difference in the day-to-day lives of millions of Americans.

From the Huffington Post | By Ellen Bravo:

This time last year, Desiree Rosado, a school bus driver in Groton, Connecticut, was dreading flu season. “Working without paid sick days, you’re always worried about what will happen if you get sick,” she said. “When my kids caught the swine flu, I missed a week of pay to stay home and take care of them, and I’m still paying off the credit card bills I racked up.”

But as of January 1, Desiree and hundreds of thousands of other Connecticut workers will begin to earn paid sick time under a new statewide paid sick days law — the first in the nation. She’ll be able to use that time if her kids are sick, if she herself falls ill, or to see a doctor for preventive care. In the process, Desiree says she’s gained “real peace of mind.”

For Desiree and workers across Connecticut, paid sick days are one immediate way to see real economic relief, even in the aftermath of a severe recession.

As someone who drives children safely back and forth to school every day, Desiree Rosado knows another benefit of paid sick days. The new Connecticut law, which applies to workers in the service sector, means those who serve our food and care for the young and the frail will not have to put the public at risk when they’re ill.

“No one should have to choose between their family’s health and their job, and no one should get fired just for getting sick,” said Jon Green, Executive Director of Connecticut Working Families, a member group of Family Values @ Work Consortium and lead organization in the broad coalition which helped win this new law. “Beginning this year, hundreds of thousands of service workers will be able to earn paid sick days that so many of us simply take for granted. This is an important but modest step towards a smarter, healthier Connecticut.”

Read more from the Huffington Post »

A cost-benefit analysis by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) examined the higher frequency of costly emergency room visits among those without paid sick leave. IWPR concluded that if workers had universal access to paid sick days, 1.3 million emergency department visits and $1 billion in health care costs could be avoided annually. Why? Because paid sick days enable people to better utilize primary care services and reduce the need for pricey emergency room visits.

These are powerful statistics, but the economic benefits of paid sick leave go far beyond the cost of healthcare. In a recent report, Demos highlights access to workplace benefits, including paid sick days, as one of their “strategies for turning bad jobs into quality employment.”

In a different report, Demos and the Young Invincibles identify paid sick leave as a “key policy” to improve the economic outlook for 18-34 year olds. Poll results showed only a quarter of young people have paid sick days, and the numbers are worse for women and Latinos. Further, younger generations feel they are worse off than their parents and many are fearful about losing a job due to illness.

Similarly, a recent report by Half in Ten found that work supports, such as paid sick leave, are particularly critical for low-income workers. They provide details about the economic need for paid sick days and other workplace benefits, and identify paid sick leave as an important indicator of a quality job. In a blog about Half in Ten’s findings, the National Partnership for Women and Families explains that without basic work supports, families will struggle to stay out of poverty and communities will experience halted economic growth.

These reports show lower health care costs, increased job security and stronger economic growth are associated with good workplace benefits – particularly paid sick days. Until all workers have access to these benefits, economic security will be out of reach for many individuals and families.

By the way, in case you hadn’t heard about Seattle’s paid sick days ordinance, watch City Council member Nick Licata discuss the recent local success. The Center for American Progress hosted an October event which brought together several champions of Paid Sick Days policies across the country, including Mr. Licata.

Will ALEC bring Cyrus the Virus back to Seattle? (photo: Seattle Coalition for a Healthy Workforce)

From PR Watch:

Will Philadelphia‘s and Seattle‘s new paid sick leave ordinances be overridden by their states? Or will the states back them up, as Connecticut has? If the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has any say in the matter, Pennsylvania and Washington State should override the city ordinances as Wisconsin has done.

ALEC is the corporate-funded bill mill where right-wing legislators and corporate members craft, then vote to approve, “model legislation” that mostly benefits the corporate bottom line. ALEC’s 2011 Annual Meeting was held in New Orleans in August.

According to materials obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy, paid sick leave was a hot topic on this year’s agenda of corporations and their allied politicians. “Paid family medical leave” was the only topic of discussion by the Labor and Business Regulation Subcommittee of the Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development Task Force, according to the meeting minutes.

Meeting attendees were given complete copies of Wisconsin’s 2011 Senate Bill 23 (now Wisconsin Act 16), as a model for state override. They were also handed a target list and map of state and local paid sick leave policies prepared by ALEC member, the National Restaurant Association. In Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Restaurant Association lobbied for SB 23 to repeal the sick leave ordinance, as did the the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce (MMAC), the local branch of the the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, an ALEC member. The effect of the repeal will be more sick workers at work, making others ill, in order to save or increase profits by corporations.

Not surprisingly, ALEC’s Labor and Business Regulation Subcommittee is co-chaired by YUM! Brands, Inc., which owns Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell. Fast food companies have fought paid sick leave across the country.

Get the full story from PR Watch »