Washington Policy Watch

News and perspective on public policy issues affecting Washington's economy and quality of life, brought to you by the Economic Opportunity Institute.

We won – now what? What Race to the Top funding means for early learning in WA

Research shows that a significant portion of children’s learning and brain development occurs in the first five years.

While the Washington State Constitution (Article IX) states that “It is the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders, without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex,” early childhood education has not been considered part of the definition of basic education.

According to the League of Education Voters, while as a state we spend about $500 million on average for each grade of K-12, we spend only $14 million dollars in state funds for each age group from birth to 5 years old on child care and early learning. When federal dollars are added, that increases to $39 million for each year. (link to LEV blog)

Fortunately for our youngest children, the federal government is making a push to support the improvement of early childhood care and education. Through the Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant the federal government is making $500 million dollars available to nine winning states. Washington state was one of those nine.

This grant will provide Washington with around $60 million over four years, the primary purpose of which is to support the roll-out of a Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement System (TQRIS).

A TQRIS system contains several components under its umbrella. It is designed to clearly identify what quality looks like in licensed child care centers, licensed family homes and other early learning settings. Assessment tools are used to measure child outcomes, child care provider interactions with children, and the quality of the learning environment. Supports for training and coaching are provided. Additional supports and incentives are given to facilities. Ratings are established based on the assessment and made available to parents and communities.

The Department of Early Learning has shifted funding from many of the quality activities it has undertaken in previous years to supplement the roll-out of TQRIS. About $42 million of the federal grant will go towards quality improvement awards, training hub incentives, program evaluation, rating and monitoring, training, coaching and technical assistance.

Additional elements of the grant will support state-wide expansion of the kindergarten assessment by paying for teacher training elements and providing incentives for child care providers that already have or who gain specific levels of higher education.

Race to the top will give Washington state a much needed boost in creating an integrated system of early care and education. Perhaps that will provide some of the impetus for making a stronger commitment to funding high quality early learning programs and professionals.

Filed under: early learning, , , , , ,

It’s tough for a kid to catch up when they start out behind

Following up yesterday’s post about the the big payoffs for intensive early learning programs, here’s another piece of the puzzle from Kevin Drum, excerpted from Mother Jones:

The chart on the right compares four big English-speaking countries on a single measure: vocabulary test scores of five-year-olds. You’d expect that children of highly educated parents would do well and children of poorly educated parents would do badly. And you’d be right. On average, the children of poorly educated parents have both genetic and environmental disadvantages, so it’s no surprise that they do worse than average.

But in the United States they do a lot worse. The Pew chart is normalized so that children of middle-educated parents score in the 50th percentile and other children are compared to that standard. In Canada, the least-advantaged kids manage to score at the 37th percentile. In the United States they score at only the 27th percentile.

Now, it’s pretty unlikely that Canadian kids with low-educated parents are genetically unluckier than American kids with low-educated parents. Genes may account for some of the overall difference between rich and poor kids, but not for the difference between Canada and the U.S. That has a lot more to do with how we raise our kids and what kind of attention we give them at early ages. On that score, the United States does wretchedly. We simply don’t give our poorest kids a fair start in life.

Read more from Mother Jones »

Filed under: early learning, , , ,

Intensive early education: A better bang for the buck than primary and secondary school?

two kidsBy Kevin Drum, excerpted from Mother Jones:

Jon Cohn has an eye-opening piece in The New Republic, “The Two Year Window,” about advances in the science of early childhood development. It opens with a description of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, a study that removed infants from warehouse-style orphanages in Romania and adopted them out:

It was ten years after the fall of the Communist dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu, whose scheme for increasing the country’s population through bans on birth control and abortion had filled state-run institutions with children their parents couldn’t support…. The new government remained convinced that the institutions were a good idea—and was still warehousing at least 60,000 kids, some of them born after the old regime’s fall, in facilities where many received almost no meaningful human interaction. [Neuroscientist Charles Nelson] prevailed upon the government to allow them to remove some of the children from the orphanages and place them with foster families. Then, the researchers would observe how they fared over time in comparison with the children still in the orphanages.

…Prior to the project, investigators had observed that the orphans had a high frequency of serious developmental problems, from diminished IQs to extreme difficulty forming emotional attachments. Meanwhile, imaging and other tests revealed that some of the orphans had reduced activity in their brains. The Bucharest project confirmed that these findings were more than random observations. It also uncovered a striking pattern: Orphans who went to foster homes before their second birthdays often recovered some of their abilities. Those who went to foster homes after that point rarely did.

This past May, a team led by Stacy Drury of Tulane reported a similar finding—with an intriguing twist. The researchers found that telomeres, which are protective caps that sit on the ends of chromosomes, were shorter in children who had spent more time in the Romanian orphanages….It was the clearest signal yet that neglect of very young children does not merely stunt their emotional development. It changes the architecture of their brains. Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: early learning, ,

Can Washington Fund The Education System Our Kids Need?

This weekend, EOI Policy Director Marilyn Watkins gave a presentation at the Washington State PTA conference. The theme of the presentation was “Can we fund the education system our kids need: Public budgets and the public good”.

The following videos of Marilyn’s presentation, courtesy of PTA member (and EOI Board member) Matt Loschen, explains the trend of disinvestment in Washington’s educational system, and the impact on our current budget priorities – especially education.

If you would like more information or to request Marilyn speak at an upcoming event for your organization, please contact us.

Filed under: education, tax and budget, , , , ,

donate

Twitter Updates

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 426 other followers