Washington Policy Watch

News and perspective on public policy issues affecting Washington's economy and quality of life, brought to you by the Economic Opportunity Institute.

Oregon legislature, voters take long-run look at budget – will Washington?

Yesterday, Oregon voters responded to the recession with strong votes in favor of two tax measures that will help preserve state funding for health care and education. The two measures provide more than a just revenue Band-Aid – they are a big first step toward resolving long-term problems in Oregon’s tax structure. So what lessons can we learn from our neighbors to the south?

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: education, health care, state economy, tax and budget, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

News and Views: The budget deficit, new revenue and taxes — choices for Washington State

Seattle Times | Gregoire’s plan to fill budget hole: cuts, taxes, federal help | Gov. Chris Gregoire proposed Tuesday what she called a “responsible, balanced approach of painful cuts and new revenue” to close the state’s $2.6 billion budget shortfall. But Gregoire’s latest budget blueprint — which relies heavily on hoped-for federal money and one-time fund transfers — did little to answer long-term questions about the sustainability of current spending levels. | More

Oregonlive.com | To prevent job killing, investigate all the suspects | At the moment, there may be no more frightening adjective in politics than “job-killing.” After all, in this economy, it seems like you’d just be finishing off a few survivors. And you could make a really chilling horror movie using not chain saws but pink slips. | More

Seattle Times | State faces nothing but bad choices | Last year was bad. This year is worse. The future won’t be much better. That, in a nutshell, describes the state budget mess lawmakers face when the Legislature convenes its 60-day session Monday. | More

Crosscut | Year of the tax dragon | Gov. Gregoire and the Democratic legislature are finally forced to touch the political third rail of raising taxes. | More

Filed under: state economy, tax and budget, work and family, , , , , , , , , , ,

Why do deficit hawks suddenly appear, every time Obama is near?

It’s been about eight years since we’ve heard the “deficit hawks” sing their song – but it’s an easy one to remember because the tune is always the same. Funny how it’s always sung loudest when the conversation turns to investments in improved health, education or infrastructure.

So says Robert Reich in The Great Debt Scare is back, in response to New York Times article predicting a sea of red ink in federal finances. The bottom line, as David Fiderer writes, the Obama administration has inherited a situation in which future deficits will dwarf all those prior to 2009.

Most states don’t have the option of deficit spending — and with the worst recession in generations now gripping the country, they’re grappling with steep declines in tax receipts. Faced with massive cuts to K-12 education, public universities, health programs, and other vital public structures, elected leaders are looking for new revenue to balance the books.

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: education, health care, state economy, tax and budget, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oregon looks to high road economic development — will Washington?

According to the Oregonian, Oregon House Democrats are proposing to fix part of the state’s budget crisis by increasing taxes on corporations and adding a new, higher tax bracket on households making more than $250,000 a year.

Comments on the Oregonian story mostly offer more of the usual scare tactics about business and wealthy individuals moving out of the state — to Washington, no less! Maybe the only fair thing to do is make sure Washington’s income tax is at least as high as Oregon’s, just so there’s a level playing field.

Kidding aside, it takes a very flexible imagination to seriously entertain the notion that the *only* reason people move or live anywhere is for low taxes, and not clean air, good parks and schools, reliable transportation, or any of the other public structures supported by our tax dollars. Would that many people really pick up and move their entire lives — families, businesses, etc. — to Alaska, or Florida, Nevada,South Dakota, Texas or Wyoming, just to save a few bucks if Washington passed an income tax? Seems doubtful.

But even if a few did, we’d attract all sorts of new businesses and families interested in moving here (and paying those taxes) for an educated workforce and a high quality of life. We’d be together on the high road toward having a better state to live and do business in, instead of being in some “race to the bottom” economic competition that no one will win.

The Oregon legislators say their proposed tax increases would bring in $500 million to fill Oregon’s current $4 billion dollar budget shortfall. The balance would be made up by $1.5-$2 billion in budget cuts, plus some spending from reserves and federal stimulus dollars.

That sure seems a lot more palatable than Washington’s all-cuts budget. I wonder whether Washington voters would feel the same way if given a chance to vote on it? The two states have different political climates, certainly. But Oregon’s ballot initiative activist Bill Sizemore (to whom Washington’s Tim Eyman is sometime compared) says voters there would support it:

It’s useless for conservatives to wage what he predicts would be an unsuccessful effort to repeal Democratic tax increases, he said.

“Oregon voters are quite conservative when it comes to broad-based taxes that affect most taxpayers,” he wrote in a blog post. “Give them a chance to tax the ‘wealthy,’ and they will likely do so.”

Filed under: education, state economy, tax and budget, , , , , , , , , , , ,

donate

Twitter Updates

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 426 other followers